An Orchestra Of Words In The Storm Of Politics: A Linguistic Analysis Of The Regent Of Pati’s Utterances In The Regional Tax Crisis

Mohammad Fikri; Ashraf Abdelbaky

Authors

Mohammad Fikri Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember, Indonesia Author
Ashraf Abdelbaky University of Newcastle, Australia Author

Keywords:

Crisis Communication, Critical Discourse Analysis, Javanese Politeness, Digital Media

Abstract

The 2025 PBB-P2 tax controversy in Pati Regency offers a revealing case of how political discourse functions as both a communicative tool and a strategic instrument during governance crises. This study analyzes three public statements by the Regent—drawn from verified news sources and recordings—using a qualitative critical discourse analysis informed by Searle’s speech act theory and Wodak’s discourse-historical approach. The analysis identifies a rhetorical trajectory from direct confrontation, marked by imperatives and declaratives asserting political strength, through a mitigation phase framed as denial of intent, to a procedural defense invoking constitutional legitimacy. These shifts are contextualized within Javanese politeness norms and the dynamics of digital media amplification. The Regent’s confrontational style clashed with cultural expectations of indirectness, intensifying public backlash, while the apology’s self-justificatory tone limited its restorative effect. The final procedural framing reasserted formal authority but failed to address emotional grievances, particularly in online spaces shaped by the viral initial statement. By linking linguistic strategies to socio-cultural and technological contexts, the study contributes to discourse studies and offers insights for culturally responsive crisis communication in democratic governance.

References

Aminudin, A. (2023). Media sosial dan wacana penundaan Pemilu 2024 dalam perspektif Norman Fairclough. Jurnal Lensa Mutiara Komunikasi, 7(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.51544/jlmk.v7i2.4416

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. State University of New York Press.

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353

Blum-Kulka, S. (1989). Playing it safe: The role of conventionality in indirectness. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies (pp. 37–70). Ablex.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1439–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6

Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2022). Digital Politics and the Public Sphere: Strategies of Influence in the Networked Era. Oxford University Press.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.

Chiluwa, I., & Ifukor, P. (2015). “War against our children”: Stance and evaluation in #BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564735

Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh University Press.

Coombs, W. T. (2021). Crisis Communication: Risk, Response, and Reputation (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Errington, J. J. (1988). Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Etiquette. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd ed.). Longman.

Fitriani, N., Nurkhalisah, & Majid, M. I. (2023). Analisis wacana pemberitaan iNews.id tentang isu penundaan Pemilu Presiden 2024. Respon Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(4), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.55681/respon.v3i4.483

Geertz, C. (1976). The Religion of Java. University of Chicago Press.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Pantheon Books.

Gudykunst, W. B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Sage.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.

Jenkins, H. (2020). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture (Updated ed.). NYU Press.

Kampf, Z. (2020). Apologies in political discourse: From regret to responsibility. Discourse & Society, 31(5), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520904321

Lauerbach, G. (2006). Rhetorical features of parliamentary discourse: A corpus-based investigation of confrontational speeches. Journal of Language and Politics, 5(2), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.5.2.07lau

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.

Mahendra, B. B. (2025). Komik digital tentang fenomena politik di Indonesia tahun 2024: Tinjauan analisis wacana kritis. Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Sosial, 7(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.12345/jpks.v7i1.532

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL. Palgrave Macmillan.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, Identity and Interaction: Sociocultural Perspectives on Politeness. Equinox.

Sukarno. (2019). Politeness strategies in Javanese. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20234

Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430

Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing About Intercultural Communication (pp. 71–92). Sage.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 1–37). Sage.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Palgrave Macmillan.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986

Van Nes, F., Abma, T., Jonsson, H., & Deeg, D. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: Is meaning lost in translation? European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y

Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). Sage.